Mission Statement

We aim to represent the scope of human diversity, foster respect for the differences among us and build on the common ground beneath us. Our goals are to:
  • Encourage and maintain a high level of balanced dialogue,
  • Strive for truth,
  • Promote common courtesy,
  • Learn about each other in order to discover other viewpoints,
  • Investigate political and social issues from all perspectives,
  • Collectively develop new ways of thinking, and
  • Open pathways for community action.

November 19, 2006

2006 Elections

On November 19, seven of us met for an engaging discussion about the recent elections. All were generally pleased with the gains made both locally and nationally by the Democratic Party - even the one registered Independent and the two registered Republicans who were with us. Many felt that the outcome was the result of widespread frustration with the performance of the Bush administration and the Republican Party. Iraq, Katrina, the Abramoff scandal, and the Foley scandal were all cited as significant factors. One member felt that the election results represented a move toward moderation in politics, while another expressed satisfaction that (at least some) Democrats won on "liberal issues" ( i.e., raising the minimum wage, providing greater access to health care, getting out of Iraq...).

As for the implications the elections hold for the immediate and not-so-immediate future, there were competing strains of optimism and pessimism. On one hand, nobody seemed to feel very optimistic that the situation in Iraq will improve much in the near future, and some even expressed fears that the confrontation could broaden into a regional - or even global - conflict. While all generally agreed that the Republicans in Congress had done a poor job of investigating possible abuses of power, there was disagreement about to what extent the Democrats should engage in widespread, high-profile investigations; some felt this would be necessary to get the nation back on the right track, while others feared it would only prevent real work from getting done.

On the other hand, some optimistically felt that our nation had "turned a corner" and was now moving away from a destructive political environment based on fear. One member found reason to hope that Democrats and Republicans would now learn to work together, and that this spirit of cooperation might even filter down to the rest of society.

It was at this point that our conversation turned toward the influence of religion and science on the political environment. Could these two realms of human endeavor - often seen as competing - actually compliment each other, thereby leading to common ground on certain political issues? Join us this Sunday as we explore this topic further. From stem cells to evolution to environmental conservation, what are the political imperatives of religion and science? Must they always be in conflict, or might they - at least in some cases - lead us in the same direction?

No comments: